Global Menu
Global Search
Back to Chapter 2Consent, Communication & Decision Making
OPINION 2.1.1
Informed Consent
Informed consent to medical treatment is fundamental in both ethics and law. Patients have the right to receive information and ask questions about recommended treatments so that they can make well-considered decisions about care. Successful communication in the patient-physician relationship fosters trust and supports shared decision making.
The process of informed consent occurs when communication between a patient and physician results in the patient’s authorization or agreement to undergo a specific medical intervention. In seeking a patient’s informed consent (or the consent of the patient’s surrogate if the patient lacks decision-making capacity or declines to participate in making decisions), physicians should:
In emergencies, when a decision must be made urgently, the patient is not able to participate in decision making, and the patient’s surrogate is not available, physicians may initiate treatment without prior informed consent. In such situations, the physician should inform the patient/surrogate at the earliest opportunity and obtain consent for ongoing treatment in keeping with these guidelines.
AMA Principles of Medical Ethics: I, II, V, VIII
Council Reports
Ethics Cases & Legal Briefs
Critically Researching the Researcher
This artifact puts a lens on social media and its devastating effects on society. The author concurs that social media is not the friend of the people. Barrett, T., & Hussey, J., (2012. accepted 2014), contend experts in the mental health field are finding crippling effects mirroring, (D.A.) Domestic Abuse.
There is no discrimination: social media takes no prisoners. The research learner will need to show key points in the studies to bring them forward. Findings and conclusion must be relevant to the topic.
Synthesis reveals the problem spaces, bringing forth unanswered questions. The process involves critical synthesis. Critical due to the level of validation, security, and inquiry. The authors must have respected, validated affiliations. Assessing the mechanics of the earlier literature review. Is it written? Is the language proper, language common to the field of study? Is it a scholarly written article? What significance does it have to the field of study? It must be relevant to the field of study.
© Copyright. All rights reserved.